Dose determines the poison. There isn't enough of aluminum or formaldehyde or mercury or DNA fragments or what ever else these over exaggerating scare tactic people peddle to try and scare you.
Vaccines save lives. Period. It has been supported over and over. EDIT - Read through all the comments made in this thread before commenting. They sure get interesting.
First comment thread ...
Person #1 - Kobbled Krafts who supported that? Oh wait the people that profit from it ! And doses of poison??? What! No mention of how many of those doses or what other poisons are mixed within that cocktail! You’ve been conned!
me- Sandra Lewis Everything is a poison...... Even water....... If you have too much of it. Money runs the world and that has been true back when people traded for better weapons to make hunting easier all the way to today where we still trade peices of metal and paper for something to make our lives easier. So, what?
The point is that if those medicines and treatments didn't show results, people would not buy them.... Especially medical insurance. They would not support a treatment that would cost them more money from getting injured by the treatment. The numbers are clear. Vaccines are effective. They have significantly less chance of causing serious harm than the disease itself.
person #2 - Mousi Terra I've been to a baby's funeral who passed from SIDS....post vax. I suppose if your child died post vax or became injured to the point where they'd depend on you for the rest of their life you'd be cool with it????
me -To person #2- Joy Cook Bouget while that is extremely hard.... There is no support that SIDS is caused by vaccinations. Just a correlation. Do you know what showed a strong connection? The way the baby was sleeping....of all things. See, we can play this "what if" game all day. But looking at the numbers, the rise of vaccination injury is much less than the disablement and death chances of the diseases themselves. Much much lower. I think I would risk the vaccine.
Second comment thread....
person #3 - Kobbled Krafts but so does method of exposure. Venom through a bite puts it into the bloodstream. Venom ingested may not do anything unless it finds direct access to your bloodstream, e.g. through cuts in your mouth.
me - Caterina Knight That is true. If you look at the aluminum salts that are given in vaccines, not only is the dose so small that it would be less than most meals you would eat, injecting it into the muscle tissue further keeps it out of the brain by the method it is moved out of the muscle. Almost all of it is excreted out in the urine.
person #3 - Kobbled Krafts actually, studies have shown the opposite. A lot of these metals from vaccines are crossing the blood-brain barrier and are being found to stay and reside in brain tissue.
me - Caterina Knight First, there is no direct causal link to increased aluminum in people to vaccines. It is unknown where the elevated levels come from. Also, some of the increase in aluminum for individuals are linked to specific medical conditions and that may be a contributing factor to why they have more aluminum hanging out in the brain. But, it is still unknown or not supported that it comes from vaccines.
And again..... Dose matters. So, the amount of aluminum that does get to the brain is way below that current safety levels.
person #3 - Can you link/tell me what the studies are called so I can read about this please?
Me - sure, Aluminum came into the publics eye a couple of decades ago when there was controversy surrounding a study that showed that there was an increased amount of aluminum in the brains of people who had Alzheimer's. Well, of course the media went with it and sensationalized it and the scientist went crazy with their studies to see if it was truly a causal link. But, they found that it had no link. then they looked at sources of aluminum that got into the body and of course vaccines were one of the sources. . . . so they researched the hell out of that too. And they found no link again. Still the mindset persists even when the evidence keeps piling up against it. Now you add Influencers that can basically post anything they want and offer no source material at all other than the original that has already been disproven over and over again..... and her we are.
So as for the sources - here is a list to look up and read. I am always suspect of anyone who uses a phrase like "do your own research" or "look it up yourself because I am not going to do it for you." These are clearly people that want to discredit and not inform.
World Health Organization (WHO) – Environmental Health Criteria 194: Aluminium (1997)
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) – Scientific Opinion on the Re-evaluation of Aluminium-containing Food Additives (2008, updated 2011)
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – Guidance for Industry: Aluminum in Large and Small Volume Parenterals Used in Total Parenteral Nutrition (2002)
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) – Toxicological Profile for Aluminum (2008)
Alzheimer’s & Neurological Effects
Alzheimer’s Association – Aluminum and Alzheimer’s Disease Fact Sheet
M. Kawahara & M. Kato-Negishi – Link between Aluminum and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: The Integration of the Aluminum and Amyloid Cascade Hypotheses (International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2011)
R. Walton – Aluminum in Drinking Water: A Health Risk? (Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, 2014)
S. Bondy – Low levels of aluminum can lead to behavioral and neurological changes (NeuroToxicology, multiple review papers)
Kidney Disease & Bone Disorders
National Kidney Foundation – Aluminum Toxicity and Dialysis Patients
D. Cannata-Andía & J. Fernández-Martín – Aluminum and bone disease in chronic renal failure (Journal of Nephrology, 2002)
J.L. Domingo – Aluminum and other metals in chronic renal failure (Journal of Nephrology, 1995)
Vaccines & Adjuvants
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – Vaccine Ingredients – Aluminum
World Health Organization (WHO) – Safety of Aluminum-containing Adjuvants (Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety, 2012)
L. Exley et al. – Aluminum in human brain tissue from donors with autism (Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 2018) [often cited in controversy, criticized for methods]
C. Mitkus et al. – Pharmacokinetics of aluminum in infants following vaccination (Vaccine, 2011)
Reviews & Overviews
R. Yokel & D. Golub – Research issues in aluminum toxicity (NeuroToxicology, 2007)
J.L. Domingo – Aluminum and health: a review (Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, 1995; updated reviews since)
R. Krewski et al. – Human health risk assessment for aluminum, aluminum oxide, and aluminum hydroxide (Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 2007)
Third comment on thread .. .
Person #4 - Kobbled Krafts someone needs to read Trace Amounts , and a hazmat sheet on each ingredient
me - Michelle Thibodeau Pearson How vague and uninformative. Its almost like you are using a static to dismiss and discredit what I said with a statement that sounds like it means something but has nothing to back it up. How original of you......
The amount of aluminum and mercury in these vaccines and the type..... You know..... Metal salts compared to elemental metal or methyl instead of ethyl...... Makes quite a difference too. The amount of these components are miniscule compared to the type and amount you are exposed to from just every day environment (be careful where you catch your fish from, you know?)
So, MS vague statement girl........ Show me good solid evidence about this "trace amounts" you are purposely eluding me to.
persin #4 - Kobbled Krafts you're wrong.
A book title and government hazmat information isn't
" vague". In fact , your ignorance is dangerous.
Me - Michelle Thibodeau Pearson Ok, you got me. I didn't realize that "Trace Amounts" was a book title. Whew! That must felt good to call me on that and then be able to get your dig in of calling me dangerously ignorant..... Wouldn't want you to miss out on a good insult, eh?p
But hey, I tell you what, I'll look it up and see if it is worth a read. I am sure it is going to be a great source for showing what conspiracy thinking or cherry picking or data that can't be reproduced would look like.
And I have no idea what hazmat info has to do with this..... The amounts of these ingredients in vaccines are at safe (usually way below safe) levels. If it was a hazmat issue then there would be people in hazmat suits swarming every children's clinic in the country.
person #4 - Kobbled Krafts they only
" swarm " if the vial breaks
That you seem clueless about synergistic effects of small doses combined , which was SUPPOSED to be evaluated to get liability shield but NEVER Was done , while the doses piled up per visit..well I guess reading fully referenced, footnoted books hasn't been your " thing" so lots of catching up to do
Turtles All The Way Down , The Real Anthony Fauci, and The Pfizer Papers are must reads also , the last one is their own FOIA data from discovery, from the lawsuit.
You will be better informed if you read just those.
There IS NO safe dose , js.
Your kind even think you know more than THE most published doctor on EARTH , Dr McCullough, his autism retrospective analysis is 🔥
me - Michelle Thibodeau Pearson ok.... I have read some of these and they are only bias feeders and conspiracy theories. They are weak with support and reliability and can't be reproduced in results. I mean you might be able to hit a target blind if you shoot enough bullets at it but doesn't mean it's true that blind people are markesmen.
person #4 - Kobbled Krafts you use words , but incorrectly. It is the PAID , PHARMA conducted trials that are not reproducible . Also fraudulent. Then we get to the papers , where the abstract and conclusion don't match the body , and have to use certain phrases in them to get published.
You're not very good at this , js
me - Michelle Thibodeau Pearson Wow, such debating skills for yourself. You know self proclaiming that I am "not very good at this" doesn't make it true. Personally, you are not really that great at it either. You give me a bunch of conspiracy theory books that have serious flaws and have been put in question and there is no evidence to counter claim. Then you randomly bring up hazmat guidelines on the ingredients to vaccines and that is wildly absurd because hazmat deals with industrial and environmental amounts that are crazy dangerous to the public. On top of that, you made a subtle claim that if one vial of vaccine dropped and spilled on the floor that hazmat would have to be called to clean it up..... And that is wildly untrue and talking in hyperbole. If a vial of vaccine breaks there is not enough of any......ANY..... Ingredient to harm a person at all. They just clean it up with a paper towel and throw it in the trash. That's how dangerous it is. And finally, using synergistic as an argument is just a red herring argument and I didn't even respond to it. The total combined amount of what you would be labeling toxins from these vaccines would not add up to be more than what a person is exposed to on a weekly basis.
If all you got is "big pharma" and "who paid for that" then you don't understand that even though I personally agree they are money grubbing greedy evil people, they get results. And contrary to your own statement, their medicine does make a difference and works. Their results are reproducible and is usually verified by an outside source that has no conflicting interest to their findings.
Personally, I don't think you are very good at this..... Js.
But, hey..... We will let others who read this decide.


